by Thom Hartmann

Link blocked? Copy it and paste in a new browser tab.
Your Rating
All ratings are anonymous
Help others by sharing
The book is a denouncement of a culture that has put the lives of billions of people in jeopardy.
One of the first points made in the book is how our population has exploded in the last 100 years, all made possible by increased food output enabled by oil. The author estimates that when our oil reserves run out, which is currently estimated to happen in 47 years, between 5-7 billion people will starve to death. That is assuming our consumption remains at our current rate, although it is more likely to continue to increase due to an expanding population and trends of increasing oil consumption. If we continue to use oil as we are, not only do we risk more than half of the population starving to death once it runs out, but we also risk hitting a tipping point for global warming which will result in large-scale shifts on a global scale.

If the current trajectory continues, large-scale net-negative changes are likely within the coming decades.
The author contends that this isn't just a problem that can be resolved by simply being more environmentally conscious, he argues that the core of the problem is cultural and true change requires a shift in the dominant world culture. He distinguishes two types of cultures, young and old cultures. Young cultures desire to dominate their surroundings and use up their resources quickly. In order to survive they must conquer neighboring areas for their resources. Eventually they self-destruct when their resources run out, the cause of many great empires collapse historically. Older cultures try living in harmony with the Earth and others and tend to exist for thousands of years. They value collaboration and community and are defined by caring for the members of their culture as much as they care about themselves. These cultures tend to work very little, just as much as their food needs require (typically 2 hours a day), and experience less health issues than we do today in nearly every category. The myth that "uncivilized" cultures are better off with a 40+ hour work week and a "do it yourself" mentality is a hard argument to make once you realize the intangible costs associated with the switch.
We are so accustomed to the culture of dominance that we often forget there is another way to live. In the book the author gives many examples of cultures that subsisted without a need or desire to dominate others, even to the point of lacking a word for the concept of war. In some of these societies humanitarianism and the sharing of resources was the ultimate measure of social status. The author attests that global problems we are about to face come as a consequence of a mentality that seeks to dominate rather than live in harmony. He goes over many examples of companies and governments that have willingly committed egregious human rights violations which he cites as a natural consequence of our younger culture mentality. "We 'eat' (consume) other humans by destroying them, destroying their lands, and consuming their life-force by enslaving them either physically or economically." This mentality has led to the general oppression of humanity and its impacts can be seen in the level of mental health problems rampant in modern society. The oppressed recognize their own oppression even if only on a subconscious level.
One particularly striking metaphor in the book likens corporations to robots—entities that cannot be killed, possess great wealth, and have convinced society to allow them to operate with minimal regulation. These "robots" continue to grow in power, acquiring land and businesses from individuals (or simply taking or destroying them), constraining the human population through low wages and rising costs of living, and in some cases knowingly poisoning and harming people. Framed in these terms, corporate behavior becomes difficult to excuse. In the late 1800s, companies were required to report to the government every 40 years, and if a company was not operating in the interest of general welfare, it was legally disbanded. The reasons for abandoning that model of business oversight remain worth questioning.
The book's message is similar to the book Ishmael by Daniel Quinn, albeit a nonfiction and non-God oriented version, as well as ideas espoused by Plato in The Republic. In both books they echo the sentiment that a mentality of only caring about oneself inevitably leads to conflict, conflict that only benefits those in power.
Our societal values have made us complicit in the devastating changes on the horizon, whether or not we acknowledge it. Only by changing our cultural mentality of competition and scarcity will we be able to sustainably live in the world. If we want to survive as a species, a shift in consciousness is required.