In-Depth Explanation
In-Depth Explanation
Radical Accountability Theory (RAT) is a synthesis of two other psychological theories which are all widely regarded as effective therapy theories namely and with the added help of bilateral stimulation.
Differentiation is a theory on emotional maturity and how to develop it based on the book Intimacy and Desire by David Schnarch which you can read about . In essence, the theory states that the problems that we have in life are a result of our personal lack of emotional maturity, not the lack of emotional maturity of others. This is a sentiment shared throughout religion including Christianity and Buddhism and nearly all famous philosophers who emphasized the ultimate virtue as the mastery of self. Taking accountability is a prerequisite to healing and you can only heal as much as you are willing to take accountability.
"Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye."
"It is our own thoughts that lead us into trouble, not other people."
"If someone succeeds in provoking you, realize that your mind is complicit in the provocation."
REBT is a theory stating that our beliefs create our reality and views healing in terms of changing unhealthy psychological beliefs. The theory uses an ABCDE formula to explain itself. A stands for Activating Event, which is whatever the event is that triggers a reaction. In REBT the event is always inherently neutral, no matter how good or bad it may seem. What determines whether the event is good or bad is B, our Belief about it. As a result of our belief we interpret the event a particular way and have a Consequence, C, which is our reaction to the event whether it be emotional, cognitive, or behavioral. As events are always inherently neutral, we, as agents of our own volition, get to choose our beliefs about them. D stands for Disputing which is challenging and changing our current belief. The successful changing of a belief results in E, Effectuating Change, which is the new set of emotional, cognitive, and behavioral reactions to the exact same event as a result of a changed belief. Taking accountability for one's beliefs allows for them to be changed resulting in increased stability and personal peace.
The theory focuses on what are called "core negative beliefs" which you can easily google to find lists of them, but they are, on the most basic level, our emotional fears. As the human brain values emotions on a hierarchical level far, far above that of logic, it doesn't matter what you think, this process is always focused on how you feel. Emotions are king when it comes to psychology and even knowing something logically doesn't necessarily impact an emotional belief.
The last element of the theory is the principle of processing behind EMDR's success called bilateral stimulation. You can read about that and how to do it .
Taking these all into account, Radical Accountability Theory is a theory of healing centered around identifying and changing any belief system that results in distress by taking accountability for how your mind is complicit in the distress with the aid of bilateral stimulation.
Structurally the process is able to be done at any one of three levels of insight. The deeper the level of insight, the more potential gain from using this method although working through distress at any level is worth doing.
Beliefs are the deepest level of self awareness and result in the largest long-term gains. "I am not enough," "I am unloveable," and "I am worthless" are the most common examples of this level of insight. Beliefs can be about oneself or the world at large.
Knowing the general thing that creates distress for you is enough to start this process. "Being called a bitch" or "my dad's death" are examples of this level of insight.
Any emotion is a good enough starting point. If you have a distressing emotion, but have no idea what it's stemming from, you can just focus on the distressing emotion e.i. anger, anxiety, sadness, etc. as the focus.
Once you have identified what you're working on from one of the three levels of insight listed above, you rate your level of distress from it on a scale of 0-10 with 10 being the most distress you can feel. This scale is used to measure change and progress. The first goal is to get to 0 on the distress scale, with a 0 meaning that you can leave the past in the past, feeling neutral towards something, or being at peace with the targeted issue. The second goal is to replace the or emotion with its mirrored . Examples include "I am enough," "I am leaving this in the past," or "peace" depending on what level of insight you're using (belief, concept, emotion). You are done when the positive belief feels 100% true. Bilateral stimulation should accompany this entire process for optimal results.
Working through something using this method can be done in one of three different ways and you can mix and match as you see fit. This is what you do while you engage in bilateral stimulation.
This method is based on the theory that your brain automatically knows how to heal itself psychologically just as it does physically with an injury. In this method you start by thinking about the chosen thing and then let go of control and allow your subconscious to take over, assuming that it will take you to what it needs to, for as long as it needs to, in order for you to heal from it. You know this method is working if you are getting images, memories, or other mental stimuli. The overall rule is if something is happening, the process is working, even if you don't understand what is happening. It isn't working if the mental stimulus is completely and objectively unrelated, such as thinking about what you will make for dinner tonight, or if your mind is completely blank. This method has the greatest variance of experience by a large margin so my rule of thumb is when in doubt of if something is relevant, keep going until you are absolutely sure it isn't.
This method deals with using logic to change emotional beliefs. As emotions are stronger than logic the process starts with understanding your emotional reaction and then using logic to break it down until it is no longer believed at an emotional level. If the logic you are trying to use isn't creating emotional change, time to try a different plan of attack. This method is the most difficult of the three, but it can be highly effective when used well. This method is working if the emotional belief is lessening and isn't working if the belief isn't changing or the distress isn't lessening. The distress scale can be used as an intervention technique in this method by asking yourself how you can lower one point on the scale or what you would need to do to lower one point, which can help you gain insight into how to make additional progress. If you choose this method it would be helpful to understand the four methods REBT uses to change beliefs which you can read about .
The body stores emotions physically and you can use your body to release trapped emotions. When thinking of the targeted issue, just notice where your body feels distressed. This method is very simple and all you do is focus your attention on the distressed body part as the feeling increases in intensity, decreases in intensity, or shifts throughout your body. This method looks for physical shifts and movement in the body which is how you know it's working. Other things you can try with this method are consciously relaxing the parts of the body that are distressed or imagining a color of light that enters into the distressed body part and helps heal it. This method works if physiological changes are occurring and is not working if nothing is changing in your body. Sometimes it takes a long time for body sensations to shift so patience in this method is sometimes necessary.
If a method isn't working there are a couple things you can do:
You cannot change a problem that you are unaware of. Thus, the ability to accurately identify beliefs dictates this method's efficacy. Identifying beliefs is by far the hardest part of this method and links on how to do it were provided earlier. I highly recommend you read those if you choose to use RAT.
That being said, don't overthink identifying a belief. It is far more effective to start and have your subconscious self-correct than for you to worry about whether or not you identified the right belief. If the belief you chose isn't the best one for you, you will figure that out in the process and identify what would be a better focus.
There are a few things I feel are worth mentioning that will help in this process:
Rate This Theory
All ratings are anonymous
Help others by sharing